Insurance claims

Trees, Clay and Two Cracking Houses

A subsidence claim on two neighbouring houses proved the proper way: trial pits, laboratory soil and root testing, arboricultural assessment and seasonal level monitoring, then a proportionate repair delivered and accounted for within the claim.
Diagonal cracking at a ceiling and wall junction caused by subsidence
Location
South west London
Property
Two neighbouring houses
Peril
Clay shrinkage subsidence
Scope
Investigation to final account

The loss

Cracking to two neighbouring houses in south west London, on London Clay, with mature trees close by: the classic ingredients of a subsidence claim. Subsidence is the peril where the diagnosis is the claim, because until the cause is proven, nobody can say what the repair is, what it costs, or whether it will hold.

The brief

Acting for the policyholders in the claim across both properties, Avalon’s job was to establish the cause with evidence that would satisfy the insurer, specify the right repair rather than the biggest one, and administer the works through to account.

Investigation before opinion

The investigation was run as a programme, not a site visit. Five strands of evidence, each pointing the same way:

  1. Trial pitsExcavated at agreed locations to expose the foundations and the ground beneath them.
  2. Laboratory soil testingHigh plasticity clay with significant desiccation to a depth of two metres, ground that shrinks as it dries.
  3. Root identificationRoots recovered from the pits identified, narrowing the vegetation implicated.
  4. Arboricultural reportA high water demand poplar within influencing distance of the rear of both houses.
  5. Level monitoringPrecise levels at fixed stations on both houses, read over time and graphed.

Clay-shrinkage subsidence is proved by movement over seasons, not by a photograph of a crack.

From cause to repair

With causation evidenced, geology, desiccation, roots, vegetation and monitored movement all pointing the same way, the findings were drawn together in summary and update reporting so the claim could move, and the repair works were then specified, valued and carried through to a final account within the claim.

The RICS guidance

The investigation and reporting followed the RICS guidance note Surveying assets in the built environment, which sets out how a surveyor inspects, investigates and reports on a building’s condition and defects. The repair works were then valued and closed to the RICS Black Book guidance on final account procedures, as part of an appointment under the Building Surveyor Services schedule used with the RICS Standard Form of Consultant’s Appointment (April 2025 edition).

The outcome

A claim that moved on evidence at every step.

A cause the insurer could acceptTwo houses investigated to laboratory standard.
A proportionate repairThe right repair, not the biggest one.
Delivered to final accountRepair works specified, valued and accounted for within the claim.

In subsidence, the cheapest part of the project is proving the cause properly; everything built on a wrong diagnosis is money spent twice.

Services demonstrated

Insurance claimsInvestigation managementCostingContract administration

Cracking in a property you manage or insure?

We investigate the cause before anyone prices a repair.

Avalon Surveyors Ltd is a chartered building surveying practice, regulated by RICS, in continuous practice since 2000.

Facing a similar matter?

Tell us about the property and what has happened. We will come back to you within two business days.